Skip to main content

Impacts of the Metal Type Press Response

Impacts of the Metal Type Press Response

By Piper Shiflet


Today in class we discussed the impacts of the metal moving type press, created by Guttenberg, and how it effected the history of writing. We first talked about different things that improved when we starting to produce better books and other things, with the metal type press.
We discussed it’s impact on religion, the spread of literacy among the lower class, how it improved our economy, and how it helped people share knowledge. I thought sharing knowledge was one of the most important topics we discussed, and the topic of how important the printing press was had also become relevant in our discussion.
Being able to share knowledge meant that people from further distances didn’t have to hear the word from another person, and word of new inventions and discoveries would no longer be jumbled up like a game of telephone. Having a printing press meant that people could make documents about scientific discoveries that could change our history, and it could be published an shared to many more people than if you were to spread it by word.
This also meant that the discoveries of new medicine would be more wide spread and people would be more knowledgeable about it. The printing press was a key invention that helped shape and spread word across America. And having a printing press also meant that more news papers were becoming relevant. People could talk about current events and issues with society (which did lead to a lot of issues and controversy before the 1st amendment), and could speak their minds. People wrote books before, but they were inconsistent and could look completely different, and making books of course required a lot of labor. This meant that many people were illiterate, but with the printing press making books was a lot easier and more sufficient and really shaped our history as writers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Response To LaNasia's: A Class Discussion!

My Response To LaNasia's: A Class Discussion! LaNasia typed an article discussing wha we had talked about recently in class, regarding not only the synagog shooting, but also the Kroger shooting. When I read over her blog, I noticed that she spoke about how we allow criminals mercy just because they have a mental illness. I had been talking about this situation a while back when the school shooting regarding Nikolas Cruz occurred. I noticed that many people who decide to shoot up local destinations, or commit hate crimes in general, usually show signs of having a mental illness or issue. L aNasia also talked about how people should be more accepting to others, she states, " This whole class discussion, and the crimes itself has me thinking of how I can become the start to the end of these problems, we as people, as Americans have failed this country, if we put aside whatever feelings, beliefs, and values we have just for a second, we can make a change." These words st...

My Response to John Woodhouse's: Entertaining, But Not Newsworthy

My Response to John Woodhouse's: Entertaining, But Not Newsworthy John's Original Post:  http://johnjournalismone.blogspot.com/2018/11/entertaining-but-not-newsworthy.html When reading John's post about a local mother and daughter winning a 1 million dollar power-ball I could quite easily understand where he was coming from when talking just about how newsworthy the story was. When stories of power-ball winnings are aired most people don't think deep into that subject, or even pay attention to the topic of conversation, so obviously it's not a very newsworthy topic to cover in the first place.  When news stations mention things here and there, like a quick sentence about how much the power-ball is worth, then I think it's fine, and can be found interesting. But when you have a whole story dedicated to a duo who won a prize, it isn't necessary.  John stated, " I believe and know that our local news has the duty and obligation to provide ...