Skip to main content

Impacts of the Metal Type Press Response

Impacts of the Metal Type Press Response

By Piper Shiflet


Today in class we discussed the impacts of the metal moving type press, created by Guttenberg, and how it effected the history of writing. We first talked about different things that improved when we starting to produce better books and other things, with the metal type press.
We discussed it’s impact on religion, the spread of literacy among the lower class, how it improved our economy, and how it helped people share knowledge. I thought sharing knowledge was one of the most important topics we discussed, and the topic of how important the printing press was had also become relevant in our discussion.
Being able to share knowledge meant that people from further distances didn’t have to hear the word from another person, and word of new inventions and discoveries would no longer be jumbled up like a game of telephone. Having a printing press meant that people could make documents about scientific discoveries that could change our history, and it could be published an shared to many more people than if you were to spread it by word.
This also meant that the discoveries of new medicine would be more wide spread and people would be more knowledgeable about it. The printing press was a key invention that helped shape and spread word across America. And having a printing press also meant that more news papers were becoming relevant. People could talk about current events and issues with society (which did lead to a lot of issues and controversy before the 1st amendment), and could speak their minds. People wrote books before, but they were inconsistent and could look completely different, and making books of course required a lot of labor. This meant that many people were illiterate, but with the printing press making books was a lot easier and more sufficient and really shaped our history as writers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Response To LaNasia's: A Class Discussion!

My Response To LaNasia's: A Class Discussion! LaNasia typed an article discussing wha we had talked about recently in class, regarding not only the synagog shooting, but also the Kroger shooting. When I read over her blog, I noticed that she spoke about how we allow criminals mercy just because they have a mental illness. I had been talking about this situation a while back when the school shooting regarding Nikolas Cruz occurred. I noticed that many people who decide to shoot up local destinations, or commit hate crimes in general, usually show signs of having a mental illness or issue. L aNasia also talked about how people should be more accepting to others, she states, " This whole class discussion, and the crimes itself has me thinking of how I can become the start to the end of these problems, we as people, as Americans have failed this country, if we put aside whatever feelings, beliefs, and values we have just for a second, we can make a change." These words st...
Post a Comment
Read more

Response to Mass Communication

Mass Communication By Piper Shiflet      Recently in our Journalism class we discussed the topic of what exactly mass communication is. After only the first few minutes, I had already come to the understanding that no one had ever taught me what mass communication really was. To me, it was just a way of spreading a statement to a large amount of people, but after hearing what Mr. Miller described as mass communication, my thoughts about it were changed.       He described mass communication as something that had the potential to spread across time and space. I found this description as something new, and exciting. Not once had I heard it being described like that, and as I listened to the lecture I became more interested in telling other people about what exactly mass communication is.       I became really intrigued when we began to converse about how the stag...
Post a Comment
Read more