Skip to main content

Media Critique: Rolling Stones Article


Media Critique: Rolling Stones Article

By Piper Shiflet



Journalism has been a hard job to have throughout history, because many of the rules/expectations have remained the same. Journalists must not let their own opinions take over while writing, and being unbiased is one of the most important things to become a stronger journalist. But in general, there are many rules that are broken often, like taking sides, plagiarizing fellow journalists' work and disrespecting their audiences beliefs. This is why most journalists walk on nails and do the right thing, they tell straight facts instead of their own opinions.
The New York Times response to the Rolling Stones article, "A Rape on Campus," that was published in 2014 (by no means a recent article) about the false rape case that happened at the University of Virginia, a female by the name Jackie accused a fraternity of raping her. This had already been removed by 2015, as stated by The New York Times, "The article, "A Rape on Campus," was retracted in April 2015 after a Columbia Journalism School report that said the magazine failed to take the basic journalistic steps to verify the account of a woman, identified only by Jackie." They later even explain that, "it was an embarrassing episode for a magazine that has long prided itself on its journalistic accomplishments."
The original article has been retracted, but it is well explained in the response and you can tell that the writers of, "A Rape on Campus," had no evidence of whether this was real or fake news, which is a violation of verification. They didn't look into the details of this case and it was quite obvious, they didn't take in the fact that this "Jackie," had no evidence to prove she had come into some type of contact with the fraternity.
The New York Times also covers the lawsuit against the Rolling Stones where the innocent fraternity sues the magazine for 1.65 million dollars, and proceeded to donate a large amount of the funds to, "groups that offer sexual assault awareness education, prevention training and victim counseling services on collage campuses."
To improve the original article, the journalists should have gone to more witnesses before publishing false information and putting a bad rep on the University of Virginia, as well as the fraternity, but overall the article is now taken down and in the past.

Sources:
Ember, Sydney. “Rolling Stone to Pay $1.65 Million to Fraternity Over Discredited Rape Story.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 13 June 2017, www.nytimes.com/2017/06/13/business/media/rape-uva-rolling-stone-frat.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My Response To LaNasia's: A Class Discussion!

My Response To LaNasia's: A Class Discussion! LaNasia typed an article discussing wha we had talked about recently in class, regarding not only the synagog shooting, but also the Kroger shooting. When I read over her blog, I noticed that she spoke about how we allow criminals mercy just because they have a mental illness. I had been talking about this situation a while back when the school shooting regarding Nikolas Cruz occurred. I noticed that many people who decide to shoot up local destinations, or commit hate crimes in general, usually show signs of having a mental illness or issue. L aNasia also talked about how people should be more accepting to others, she states, " This whole class discussion, and the crimes itself has me thinking of how I can become the start to the end of these problems, we as people, as Americans have failed this country, if we put aside whatever feelings, beliefs, and values we have just for a second, we can make a change." These words st...
Post a Comment
Read more

Impacts of the Metal Type Press Response

Impacts of the Metal Type Press Response By Piper Shiflet Today in class we discussed the impacts of the metal moving type press, created by Guttenberg, and how it effected the history of writing. We first talked about different things that improved when we starting to produce better books and other things, with the metal type press. We discussed it’s impact on religion, the spread of literacy among the lower class, how it improved our economy, and how it helped people share knowledge. I thought sharing knowledge was one of the most important topics we discussed, and the topic of how important the printing press was had also become relevant in our discussion. Being able to share knowledge meant that people from further distances didn’t have to hear the word from another person, and word of new inventions and discoveries would no longer be jumbled up like a game of telephone. Having a printing press meant that people could make documents about scientific discoveries that could chang...
Post a Comment
Read more

My Response to John Woodhouse's: Entertaining, But Not Newsworthy

My Response to John Woodhouse's: Entertaining, But Not Newsworthy John's Original Post:  http://johnjournalismone.blogspot.com/2018/11/entertaining-but-not-newsworthy.html When reading John's post about a local mother and daughter winning a 1 million dollar power-ball I could quite easily understand where he was coming from when talking just about how newsworthy the story was. When stories of power-ball winnings are aired most people don't think deep into that subject, or even pay attention to the topic of conversation, so obviously it's not a very newsworthy topic to cover in the first place.  When news stations mention things here and there, like a quick sentence about how much the power-ball is worth, then I think it's fine, and can be found interesting. But when you have a whole story dedicated to a duo who won a prize, it isn't necessary.  John stated, " I believe and know that our local news has the duty and obligation to provide ...
Post a Comment
Read more