Response to Isabella Bonilla's: Consumption of Mass Communication
By Piper Shiflet
As I read Isabella's article, Consumption of Mass Communication, I became more intrigued in her explanation and views on this topic. She pointed out many ideas and thoughts she had, as well as questions. Isabella ends her first paragraph with the question, "How do we observe this information, and whats the science behind the phycological categorization?" She expresses her thoughts about how we process mass communication, which interested me as well.Throughout the article Isabella kept a consistent mindset, educating other people about what she already knew, and also diving deeper into topics we didn't discuss in our recent lectures in class. I found this quite interesting and found myself wanting to know the answer too.
She then goes to explain her interest in filters, especially the phycological filter. Isabella explained it as, "When you impose the physiological filter on your daily life, you basically shun this whole part of your world. If it doesn't fit your views, you won't even acknowledge." While explaining her interest in phycological filters, Isabella also talks about how difficult it is for many people to have a physical filter, where they are unable to read the paper based on a physical issue.
Overall I think that Isabella's article and writing style are very unique and make you question things as much as she questions it herself. I really enjoyed the fact that she could see her interest in the lecture, and how dedicated Isabella was to being attentive in class.
Comments
Post a Comment