Skip to main content

My Response to Karlie Brockman's: Are Vague Titles Necessary?

My Response to Karlie Brockman's: Are Vague Titles Necessary?


Karlie Brockman covered a specific topic that is rarely addressed by journalists. The 'clickbait" title trend. She explained her thoughts on how journalists use vague titles that are too unspecific to blow up their article to be more entertaining than it actually is. I believe she made great points, because I often see titles in the news, (even from official trustworthy cites) that often make me question the reality of the problem. I found that many people think this to be true, but have a harder time admitting to it. 

Journalists often use this form of 'clickbait' to gain attention for their article, and I personally agree with Karlie when she says, "In my opinion, if the title tells readers the important details and the story is newsworthy, the reader is more inclined to click as they want to know the smaller details too. The bottom line is, most people only have time to glance at a story headline. The titles need to be informative so their time is not wasted." She mentioned this in the last half of her paragraph and I think I found this very true. Clickbait is a popular online term to explain what you tubers and social media users use as their thumbnail/title to make viewers click faster. 

For example, a person could have a thumbnail of them eating makeup, and since it's such a strange thing to see, viewers might click thinking that the person will actually proceed to do as the title said. But their misleaded, it's a regular makeup video. This is quite often used in the news, so I'm glad that Karlie took the time to speak her mind about the topic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Magazines - 1st National Media

Magazines - 1st National Media Today in class we discussed the topic of magazines, specifically regarding the fact that they were the first national media. Magazines were quite appealing to me, seeing as they are still quite often found in stores everywhere like checkout lines and bookstores. We talked about Magazines including different types of content, making them appeal to more audiences. Comics and pictures were used to draw in people who were illiterate, and other things such as recipes, poems, and songs were effective towards aliterate people.  I found it interesting that many types of media have had to desmassify throughout history, because of other new medias taking their spot, magazines being no different. Though I still find interest in magazines. People flip through them in waiting offices or purchase them before a plane ride. Almost like movies, magazines are still a quite popular form of media that we see. In fact, some magazines are making more money off the peo...

Response to Demassification

Response to Demassification  By Piper Shiflet Demassification was a word I had never heard of until our recent discussion about the topic in class. We had covered mass communication in pervious weeks, but demassification was a new concept. The thought originally stuck in my head that demassification meant losing your mass audience in some way, but it wasn't, it was how you deal with losing your mass audience. I had to think about this for a long time, how exactly would I deal with losing a mass audience?  During this situation you would have to figure out how to gain your audience back, and this is seen everywhere, especially in social media, which I had realized as the definition was being told to me. You see demassification everywhere in this century, and that's why I was surprised that I had never heard of the term before. Demassification happens all the time, and I was oblivious. That's why I was so interested in this topic.  We then proceeded to learn about ...